|
Table of Contents
Terms Used In This Article
brainstem - base of the brain which connects to the spinal cord and
controls basic functions such as breathing and heart rate
foramen magnum - opening in the base of the skull through which the
brain and spine connect
hypoplasia - underdevelopment of a body part
morphometric - in this article, refers to measuring dimensions of the
skull and brain
posterior fossa -region in the back of the skull where the cerebellum
is situated
skull base - the lower bones of the skull
Common Chiari Terms cerebellar tonsils -
portion of the cerebellum located at the bottom, so named because of their
shape
cerebellum - part of
the brain located at the bottom of the skull, near the opening to the spinal
area; important for muscle control, movement, and balance
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) - clear liquid in the brain and spinal
cord, acts as a shock absorber
Chiari malformation I -
condition where the cerebellar tonsils are displaced out of the skull area
into the spinal area, causing compression of brain tissue and disruption of
CSF flow
decompression surgery -
general term used for any of several surgical techniques employed to
create more space around a Chiari malformation and to relieve compression
syringomyelia -
condition where a fluid filled cyst forms in the spinal cord
|
July 31st, 2009 -- For several years now, researchers have been using
MRIs to measure skull base dimensions of Chiari patients in what is known as
morphometrics. It was from this type of research that emerged the
theory that a significant number of Chiari cases - if not a majority - are
caused by an underdevelopment of the skull in the occipital area (Figure 1).
In other words, it is not that the brain is too big for the skull, but
rather that the skull is too small for the brain.
While the evidence is fairly strong that there is
something of interest in the posterior fossa region of Chiari patients, as
is often the case, the devil is in the details. Researchers have used
various methods to measure the posterior fossa volume and in some cases have
found that indeed on average Chiari patients tend to have smaller posterior
fossas than normal. However, this is not true for every patient and
other studies have contradicted this finding, with one showing that only
Chiari men had smaller posterior fossas, and another finding that only
patients with both Chiari and syringomyelia had smaller posterior fossa
regions. Because of this, researchers are still exploring different
ways to analyze the relative size of this skull region. Some have
tried using a volume ratio of skull to brain tissue, while others have
turned to measuring specific bone segments as opposed to general volume
measurements.

Figure 1: Occipital Bone and Posterior Fossa (from Conquer Chiari:
A Patient's Guide)
This is the approach that a group of French
researchers took in using morphometrics to look for skull undergrowth in a
group of 17 adult Chiari patients as compared to a group of healthy
controls. They published their findings recently on-line in the
Journal of Neurosurgery. All the Chiari patients had at least 5mm of
herniation and were clearly symptomatic. The controls were taken from
people who had had MRIs associated with migraines but were found to not have
any herniation. Based on previously published morphometric studies,
the researchers decided to focus on 4 skull measurements and 3 brain tissue
measurements (Figure 2 and Figure 3).

Figure 2: Skull Measurements Used in Study:
a) basiocciput, FM) foramen magnum (FM), b) supraocciput,
c) tentorial angle

Figure 3: Brain Measurements Used in Study:
d) hindbrain length, e) cerebellum length, f) tonsillar herniation
The researchers found that of the four skull
measurements, only the basiocciput differed significantly between Chiari
patients and the controls (Table 1). Specifically, for the Chiari
group the average length of this bone was 19.4 mm compared to 25.7 mm for
the controls. Interestingly, the brainstem and cerebellum lengths
didn't differ between the two groups, supporting the idea that the brains of
Chiari patients are of normal size. Also of note was that the fact
that the length of tonsillar herniation did not correlate to any other
measurements, providing even more evidence that the size of a Chiari
malformation is not a good indicator of the crowding or symptoms.
In discussing their findings, and the entire idea of a
small posterior fossa, the authors make an interesting point; namely that if
the skull abnormalities found with Chiari are due to a defect in the early
embryo, why is there such a range in the age when symptoms become apparent?
Why isn't everyone symptomatic at a very early age? One possibility,
as the authors note, is that there are actually different mechanisms which
can lead to a mismatch between the skull and the brain. For example,
some skull sutures don't fully close until late teens or adulthood, which
could push back symptoms. This would imply that in some cases Chiari
is actually a dynamic phenomenon, and there are case studies which support
this view.
However, another possibility is that crowding alone
doesn't always lead to symptoms. For example, perhaps over time scar
tissue and adhesions build up which then lead to symptoms. Of course a
wild card in all of this speculation is what role physical trauma plays in
sparking symptoms, which is currently not well understood.
Morphometrics is a promising area of Chiari research,
but in order to really have an impact results from these types of studies
must be synthesized into some type of useful theory.
-- Rick Labuda
Back to Table of Contents |
Key Points
-
Morphometric research involves using MRIs to take
quantitative measurements of the skul
-
In general this type of research has shown that Chiari
patients tend to have abnormal posterior fossas
-
However, measures of total volume have produced inconsistent
results
-
French study looked at 17 adult Chiari patients compared to
a group of controls
-
Found that only the length of the basiocciput bone was
significantly different
-
The brains of the Chiari patients were similar in size to
those of the controls
-
Researchers point out that it is not clear why if the bone
undergrowth occurs at the embryo stage that symptoms develop over such a
wide range of ages
Table 1: Morphometric
Measurements, Chiari vs Controls
| |
Chiari |
Control |
Sig? |
| basiocciput (mm) |
19.4 |
25.7 |
Y |
| foramen magnum (mm) |
37.1 |
35.4 |
N |
| supraocciput (mm) |
40.7 |
40.9 |
N |
| tentorial angle (degrees) |
85.3 |
84.6 |
N |
| brainstem (mm) |
40.7 |
43.2 |
N |
| cerebellum (mm) |
52.7 |
49 |
N |
Note: Sig? refers to
whether the difference between groups was statistically significant and not
likely due to chance.
Source: Incidence of basioccipital hypoplasia in Chiari
malformation Type I: comparative morphometric study of the posterior cranial
fossa. Noudel R, Jovenin N, Eap C, Scherpereel B, Pierot L, Rousseaux
P. J Neurosurg. 2009 May 22. [Epub ahead of print]
Related C&S News Articles:
Can A Child Grow Out Of Chiari?
More Findings Involving Chiari & Abnormal Skull Geometry
Can Posterior Fossa Volume
Indicate Symptom Severity?
Small Posterior Fossa Linked To Chiari Related Syringomyelia
Is Chiari 0 For Real? Research Shows Small Posterior Fossa In Chiari
0 Patients
Chiari Link To Small Posterior Fossa Confirmed In Adults
|