|
|
In Part 2 of our Spotlight on acupuncture, we talk with Thomas Ost, a
licensed acupuncturist, practicing in a hospital setting at the UPMC Center
for Complementary Medicine. Given his clinical situation, Mr. Ost has
gained valuable insight into the similarities and differences between
Western and Traditional Chinese Medicine and how the two can complement each
other. He graciously agreed to go In The Spotlight to share his
insights:
How and when did you become interested in acupuncture?
O: It all started when I was living in LA.
I started school in '93 - the acupuncture part - I was going through premed
prior to that with my focus set on going to Med school in Sweden. I
had been in LA for about 10 years and thought I'd go back to Sweden.
In the process of finishing school in LA, I kept running into people with
acupuncture experience, and then I happened to see a special on TV with Bill
Moyers called "Healing With The Mind", and that sparked my interest.
But I went to Sweden and after a year decided that medical school in Sweden
wasn't going to work. I had been away for too many years and it was a
culture shock. So now, back in LA, I was behind the process of going
to a US med school, so I made a decision to check out acupuncture and did a
lot research. I found a scientific basis for it and realized that I
could help people using acupuncture.
What type of acupuncture training/education
did you receive prior to obtaining your license?
O: I received a Master's Degree in Traditional Chinese Medicine.
I spent four years at a school called Yo San University in Los Angeles.
Having started
down the Western medical training track and then completing the Traditional
Chinese Medicine training, do you think the framework for TCM - the concept
of Qi, Blood, Body Fluid, the Five major organs, etc. - is in conflict with
the Western model, or do they complement each other?
O: You're looking at the same things through two different eyes.
Looking at TCM is a perfectly rational way to deal with healthcare. In
many ways it is exactly the same way we deal with it in Western medicine,
it's just that we have different means of dealing with it and more
importantly a different language. It's a valid form of medicine in its
ancient forms, but it is different in that it doesn't lend itself to the
thoughts and theories in Western medicine. So you need to learn the
differences and really become bilingual. I work in a hospital setting
and have no choice.
From
a clinical point of view, do you find yourself mixing the two?
O: Absolutely. In my heart and soul, I've learned TCM, I
appreciate it and find it fascinating. But a lot of that I keep to
myself during my evaluations, because if I go out too strongly along that
path, people will lose what I'm talking about, and I need to explain things
to them in a language they are familiar with. Especially so that they
can relate what I say to other healthcare providers and avoid any confusion.
Do you think there
is much difference between the acupuncture practiced in China and the US?
O: It depends on who you talk to. What I do is different, I'm
not the traditional person. I appreciate science and medicine and
think the relationship should be strong. The main thing that is
different is that in China, TCM is completely integrated into their medical
model, that's just the way they are. Here, although I work in a
hospital based clinic, we still have very little integration.
I also think the Western model has a tendency to be a little more
scientific. Looking at the research that comes out of China, and not
to say that all research from there doesn't have value, but it's not
randomized controlled trials. In China, there isn't that requirement
to be called research.
Given you've seen both sides of the coin, do you believe acupuncture works
by changing the flow of Qi, or is a different mechanism in play?
O: Yes, that is the ancient theory. The problem with the Qi is
that you can't measure or extract or touch it, but it is something you
experience the effect of once you manipulate it. That is what instills
the sense of well-being, or fixes the problem. There is a lot of
research trying to explain how acupuncture works. There are studies
that use functional MRI to assess what occurs during acupuncture, and that
is pretty hard core science. You can't really argue the outcome of
fMRI. But when you apply that technology to acupuncture, and you come
up with data you can't explain, you have a dilemma. Do you discredit
the fMRI or do you accept the fact we don't understand this [acupuncture].
But MRI, like any diagnostic tool, has limitations.
O: Correct, but these are current studies where they looked at a point
on the little toe which ancient theory ties to improving visual disorders.
So in the clinical world you would validate that by looking at the visual
cortex [in the brain]. The fMRI reveals a very strong response in the
visual cortex - the same response as the strongest visual stimuli, an
8hz checkered light - when the point on the toe is manipulated. As a
further control, a random point on the foot generates only a random
response. So there is some relationship which we do not know.
In the TCM, that meridian starts in the eye and ends on the outside of the
little toe. What that meridian is, we don't know. Is it Qi or do
we not know the nerve paths? I don't know, but something is there.
For someone with serious neurological conditions like Chiari/SM, would you
advise someone to use acupuncture as a primary treatment for the underlying
condition, or more to help with the associated pain?
O: First of all, I would not be the only point of contact for a
condition like that. If I suspected someone of a condition like that,
I would refer them out before starting acupuncture. Once the diagnosis
was confirmed, and they came back to me, we could initiate a collaborative
work. I've seen a lot of people with serious neurological disorders -
a spinal cord situation - where some procedures didn't turn out that great,
but acupuncture was able to improve their quality of life and reduce pain.
Can acupuncture help with neuropathic pain?
O: In my clinical experience, yes. Now, to varying degrees of
course. Serious nerve problems can be very complicated. Some
people are hypersensitive to stimulus. But usually with time, it will
work. You just have to be patient.
How long, a year?
O: I would not treat a person for a year with no results.
I would expect some type of response after 10-12 treatments, 10-12 weeks.
Something should change in that timeframe. If it doesn't, I might be
inhibiting another form of care that might be more beneficial.
Do you think a patient's attitude towards acupuncture influences the success
or failure of the treatments?
O: I think in medicine in general it does. Maybe even more so
with something like acupuncture because its different. Patients are
sometimes embarrassed to come to acupuncture even though they know it might
be very good for them. You know, don't tell my doctor that I'm here
kind of thing. It's unfortunate that it is that way. We know
attitudes in general affect overall health and well being, especially with
chronic pain. Attitude plays a role, whether it really affects things
physiologically, I don't know.
What might a typical treatment plan entail?
O: If someone comes in with something complicated, a neurological
situation, I would tell them upfront, give it 8-12 treatments.
Something might happen sooner, but it might not. Most people respond
to acupuncture, if not, we need to go over the situation. Some
problems [of not responding to acupuncture] can be from medications that are
competing for the same resources. People on serious narcotic
medications may not respond in the same way because the narcotics are
competing for the same type of response as the acupuncture, so the effect
isn't as dramatic.
What about simple NSAID's like Alleve?
O:
No, that's a whole different mechanism.
How long would a typical treatment last?
O: Appointments are scheduled for an hour. Within the hour is
going over the history, questions and answers, etc.
Do you use electric stimulation with the acupuncture?
O: Yes, that's pretty much the only thing I use for something like
this, for pain. The reason for that is that the body communicates with
electrical impulses. We know from research that the body responds very
well to certain frequencies.
Can the electrical treatments ever cause negative reactions?
O: I have never had anybody with a negative reaction, but of course
that is a possibility. The important point is to know the problem you
are dealing with, understand it, and know how to address it properly.
The intensity used is what might irritate a nerve. An EMG, for
example, uses very high stimulation. Acupuncture uses very low
stimulation.
Return To Table Of Contents |
In the Spotlight:
Thomas Ost, LAC, MA
UPMC Center for Complementary Medicine
Pittsburgh, PA
Qualifications:
-
Board Certified
Acupuncturist
-
Member of the Board
of Directors of the National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and
Oriental Medicine
-
Past National
Spokesperson for the National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and
Oriental Medicine
-
Member American
Association of Oriental Medicine
Education:
-
MA,
Traditional Chinese Medicine; Yo San University, Los Angeles, CA
-
Pre-Med, SSVN,
Norrkoping, Sweden
-
Pre-Med, Santa
Monica College, Santa Monica, CA
University of
Pittsburgh Center for Complementary Medicine
-
Hospital based center
which combines natural healing practices with conventional medicine
-
Services are designed
to complement, not replace, modern medicine
-
Member of the
Association of Academic Health Centers for Integrative Medicine (AAHCIM)
-
Services include:
Acupuncture
Biofeedback
Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy
Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing
Integrative Medicine
Massage Therapy
Naturopathic Counseling
Prolotherapy
Reflexology
Shiatsu
-
For more information,
call 412-623-3023
------------------------------------------------------
For more information on Traditional Chinese Medicine and acupuncture,
including definition of common terms, see
Daily Living: TCM & Acupuncture.
|